Oregon, Washington, California, and Hawaii have joined forces to challenge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s recent COVID-19 vaccine guidelines. This unprecedented move by the Western States Health Alliance comes in response to what they perceive as political interference in public health decisions under the current leadership. The alliance argues that the CDC's limited recommendations, restricting booster eligibility primarily to older adults and high-risk individuals, lack sufficient scientific backing.
The FDA's approval of a COVID-19 booster shot last month, coupled with the CDC's narrow guidance, prompted the four states to release their own, more expansive recommendations. Their statement advocates for broader access, making the vaccine available to anyone over six months of age who desires it. Oregon's state health officer, Dr. Dean Sidelinger, emphasized the importance of preserving individual choice, particularly in rural areas.
Dr. Sidelinger highlights key differences between the state alliance's recommendations and the federal guidelines. While there's some overlap concerning individuals over 65 and those with pre-existing conditions, the states contend that the FDA's limitations lack supporting data. The alliance's recommendations are grounded in a thorough review of scientific evidence and input from medical experts, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
The alliance emphasizes vaccination for high-risk groups, including children under two (the age group with the second-highest hospitalization rates), immunocompromised individuals, those with underlying conditions, and residents of congregate living settings. However, their key message is that access should be extended to everyone who wants protection, regardless of risk factors. Dr. Sidelinger clarifies that while the vaccine's efficacy in preventing severe illness and hospitalization is undeniable, its ability to prevent transmission is less certain and has evolved with the virus itself.
Responding to questions about a hypothetical healthy 40-year-old who’s already had prior vaccinations and a COVID infection, Dr. Sidelinger emphasizes a personalized discussion weighing the benefits (reduced risk of illness, long COVID, and lost productivity) against the very low risks associated with vaccination. The potential for myocarditis in adolescent and young adult males is acknowledged, but it's stressed that the risk is lower than contracting the disease itself.
The alliance's recommendations have immediate practical implications in Oregon. New rules implemented by the Oregon Board of Pharmacy allow pharmacists to administer COVID-19 vaccines without requiring prescriptions, restoring broader accessibility. The state is also working to ensure continued cost-free access through Medicaid and private insurers. However, Dr. Sidelinger expresses concern about the ongoing politicization of public health, noting that regaining trust and fostering a non-partisan approach will be a lengthy process.
---
Originally published at: https://www.opb.org/article/2025/09/18/west-coast-covid-19-vaccine-guidelines-oregon-health-officer/
